CAST depends on scientists, researchers, and professionals who contribute their expertise to publications, programs, and governance. This hub covers every volunteer role at CAST — what you do, what CAST does for you, the policies that apply, and who to contact.

Volunteer Hub

Task Force Authors & Reviewers

Task Force publications are CAST’s core scientific output — peer-reviewed papers that translate agricultural science into credible, accessible information for policymakers, media, and the public. Authors and reviewers drive this process.

Task Force — CAST Volunteers

Publication Process

Every CAST Task Force publication follows the same pipeline, from proposal to public rollout.

  1. A workgroup member or stakeholder submits a Publication Proposal.
  2. The appropriate workgroup reviews and votes on the concept.
  3. If recommended, the Board of Directors reviews and votes on approval.
  4. A Task Force is assembled: Chair(s), Authors, and Reviewers.
  5. Authors develop the publication with Chair and CAST staff support. CAST schedules check-ins to track progress — Task Forces are also encouraged to meet between official check-ins.
  6. The publication undergoes external peer review. Reviewers are selected from a list suggested by authors or workgroup members; each manuscript requires a minimum of three reviews.
  7. CAST executes the official rollout — media outreach, social, and distribution.

Rollout format

CAST's primary rollout format is a live webinar. Two to four authors present the publication for approximately 30–45 minutes, followed by a live Q&A session. The publication is then made available on the CAST website.

In-person rollout events are also possible when there is a conference, meeting, or event with a relevant audience. These can take place up to a year or two after the webinar release and follow the same format: panel discussion followed by Q&A.

Task Force Authors

Authors are subject matter experts recruited to research, write, and refine CAST Task Force publications. Authorship implies full accountability for the content.

What you do

  • Research and write your assigned section(s) of the publication
  • Participate in Task Force meetings and correspondence
  • Respond to reviewer feedback and revise as needed
  • Review and approve the final version before rollout
  • Disclose any use of AI tools in your writing process
  • Be available to participate in the rollout webinar when requested

What CAST provides

  • Editorial support and style guidance from CAST staff
  • Peer review coordination
  • Design, layout, and DOI assignment
  • Full rollout: media pitch, social promotion, and distribution
  • Reach report after publication

Chair responsibilities

Task Force Chairs coordinate the author group, maintain momentum, and serve as the primary point of contact with CAST staff. Chairs are recruited from within the workgroup or CAST's expert network. The Chair's specific responsibilities include:

  • Developing a list of potential authors and reviewers, including individuals outside CAST's membership
  • Leading Task Force coordination and meetings
  • Developing the paper outline and overseeing content integration
  • Managing reviewer feedback and directing final revisions
  • Authoring or delegating key sections and summary documents
  • Collaborating with CAST staff on promotional materials and design
  • Approving the final publication and actively participating in rollout

When You Join a Task Force

When you're confirmed as a Task Force Author or Reviewer, CAST sends you an onboarding document covering who we are, how the publication process works, your role, and the key policies you need to know before writing begins.

Download the Author Onboarding Document (current version)

Membership benefit: All Task Force participants — Chairs, Authors, and Reviewers — receive a complimentary CAST individual membership for one year after the publication releases, plus complimentary printed copies on request.

Tools & platforms

CAST operates on Microsoft 365. All Task Force members are expected to use Microsoft Teams for meetings and correspondence with CAST staff. If you don't currently have Teams access, it's free to download — your CAST staff contact can help you get set up.

CAST also uses Notion to track publication progress. You'll receive a link to the Publications Tracker when you join your Task Force — it shows current stage, notes from the last meeting, individuals involved, and key documents in one place. Each check-in is recorded by CAST and notes are uploaded to Notion so you can always review what was last discussed.

Publication types

CAST produces four types of publications. The type you're contributing to affects scope, timeline, and how the Task Force is structured.

Commentary / Policy Brief
1–7 pages. Smaller Task Force. A response or follow-up to past CAST papers, USDA outputs, or emerging policy issues. Timeline: 1.5–5 months.
Issue Paper
8–24 pages. Focused topic, light visuals, brief citations. The most common CAST publication type. Timeline: approximately 6 months.
Special Publication
25–150 pages. Often workshop-based, collaborative projects involving multiple contributors. Timeline: 7–24 months.
Task Force Report
40–200 pages. Comprehensive analysis with extensive visuals and citations. Timeline: 7–24 months.

Issue Paper timeline

For the most common publication type, CAST targets a six-month timeline from Task Force assembly to launch:

Initiation
Days 1–30
Project setup and coordination
Task Force Formation
Days 31–60
Member selection and documentation
Kickoff
Days 61–75
Scope and timeline review
Development
Days 76–145
Content creation, peer review, and revisions
Finalization
Days 146–180
Final edits and design/formatting
Launch
Day 180
Webinar release and distribution

Key documents to read before you begin

Handbooks

A dedicated volunteer handbook for each role is in development. The Board of Directors handbook will be released once it has been aligned with the current Bylaws. Check back here or contact CAST staff for the latest version.

Task Force Reviewers

Reviewers provide external peer review of Task Force publications before release. Review requires expert evaluation, interpretation, and scientific judgment — none of which can be delegated to AI tools.

What you do

  • Read and evaluate the manuscript for scientific accuracy, rigor, and clarity
  • Provide written feedback to CAST staff within a two-week timeline
  • Submit comments via the CAST Project Manager (Notion)
  • Disclose any use of AI tools in drafting your review comments

What CAST provides

  • The full manuscript and reviewer guidelines in advance
  • A clear timeline and single point of contact at CAST staff
  • Credit in the published document as a reviewer

AI Use in Publications

CAST recognizes the potential of generative AI tools but maintains strict standards of integrity, transparency, and accountability. The rules differ slightly for authors and reviewers.

Applies to all Task Force members: Any use of AI tools must be disclosed. Failure to disclose is a violation of CAST's research integrity standards. The rules differ by role — see below.

For Authors

Permitted — with full disclosure
  • Organizing content or improving clarity, grammar, and readability
  • Summarizing existing literature for background knowledge
  • Generating or refining outlines, headings, or structural elements
  • Supporting idea generation or exploration of research questions
Prohibited
  • Replacing human authorship or being listed as an author or co-author
  • Submitting AI-generated content without disclosure
  • Including unverified AI-generated data or references
  • Generating figures, graphics, images, or cover art

Mandatory disclosure for authors: Any permitted AI use must be disclosed in the "Methods" or "Acknowledgements" section of the publication, including the tool name, specific model, and version. All AI-generated content must be independently fact-checked with sources cited.

For Reviewers

Permitted — with disclosure to CAST staff
  • Improving the clarity, grammar, or readability of your own written feedback — provided no manuscript content is entered into the AI system and the tool does not retain inputs for training
Prohibited
  • Analyzing or evaluating the manuscript
  • Summarizing submitted work
  • Assessing scientific validity, rigor, or novelty
  • Drafting substantive review comments or recommendations

Reviewers who use any permitted AI tool must disclose to CAST staff when submitting their review, including the tool name, specific model and version, and a brief description of how it was used.

Post-Publication Policy

Authors may develop new scholarly works based on a CAST Task Force publication after CAST's official rollout — provided the result is a new and substantively different publication.

Requirements

  • Timing: Submit only after CAST's official rollout.
  • New work: Must be sufficiently revised and expanded — minor edits are not sufficient.
  • Source material: Develop from your original submitted draft, not from CAST's edited version or CAST-designed visuals. CAST owns the copyright for visuals produced by staff or contractors.
  • Attribution: Cite the CAST publication in the new work.
  • Task Force notification: All Task Force members (Chairs, Authors, Reviewers) must be informed and given the opportunity to indicate whether they wish to be listed as contributors.
  • CAST staff notice: Notify CAST staff in advance of your intent to submit externally.
  • Costs: CAST does not cover page charges, open-access fees, or any publication costs for external submissions.

Prohibited: Submitting the CAST publication itself, or a minimally altered version, to another outlet. Using CAST-funded editing, design, or layout work without Board approval. Submitting before the CAST rollout.

What Happens at Rollout

Every Task Force publication gets CAST's full promotion treatment:

  • Media outreach: CAST pitches the publication to agricultural journalists, science writers, and policy reporters.
  • Social media: Posts across LinkedIn, X, Facebook, and Instagram using your bio and headshot. CAST may tag you and your institution.
  • Newsletter: Featured in CAST's Connections newsletter to members and subscribers.
  • Share kit: Text-based kit with suggested language for you and your institution to share through your own channels.
  • Reach report: After rollout, CAST sends you website views, downloads, and social reach data.

Your Profile

CAST needs the following from every Task Force author and reviewer:

  • Headshot (JPEG or PNG, minimum 800px wide)
  • Short bio (2–3 sentences: name, title, institution, area of expertise)
  • Full bio for publication acknowledgements (if requested by CAST staff)
  • LinkedIn profile URL

Submit to your CAST staff contact when you join the Task Force — not at rollout.

Your CAST Contacts

Volunteer Questions Kaylee Kleitsch Programs & Engagement Manager kkleitsch@cast-science.org
Communications & Promotion Carlos Back Vianna Director of Marketing & Communications cvianna@cast-science.org

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on publication type. Issue Papers (the most common) target a six-month timeline. Commentaries and Policy Briefs typically take 1.5–5 months. Special Publications and Task Force Reports can take 7–24 months. CAST staff will provide a timeline when the Task Force is assembled and keep you informed throughout.

Task Force members are recruited by CAST staff and the Task Force Chair based on expertise. If you want to be considered for future Task Forces, contact CAST staff to express your interest and areas of expertise.

Yes. Task Force publications often have multiple authors each responsible for specific sections. CAST staff and the Chair will define your scope when you join the Task Force.

Reviewers are asked to return feedback within two weeks. CAST staff will specify the deadline when they send the manuscript. Contact your CAST staff contact as early as possible if you anticipate difficulty meeting the timeline.

Yes, but only in a limited capacity — organizing content, improving clarity or grammar, summarizing existing literature, or refining outlines. AI may not generate the substantive content of your work or produce figures and graphics. Any use must be disclosed in the "Methods" or "Acknowledgements" section, including the tool name, model, and version.

No. AI tools do not qualify for authorship. You are solely responsible for all content produced with AI assistance.

Only to improve the clarity, grammar, or readability of your own written feedback — not to analyze the manuscript, summarize it, or generate substantive comments. No manuscript content may be entered into the AI tool. Disclose any AI use to CAST staff when submitting your review.

Failure to disclose is a violation of CAST's research integrity standards. If you realize after submission that you forgot to disclose, contact CAST staff immediately.

Yes, but only after the official CAST rollout and only if the submission constitutes a new and substantively different publication. Notify all Task Force members and CAST staff before submitting, and cite the original CAST publication.

No. CAST owns the copyright for visuals, design, and layout produced by CAST staff or contractors. Submit a formal request to CAST staff if you want to use CAST-owned materials — requests are reviewed by the Board.

Yes — all Chairs, Authors, and Reviewers must be informed and given the chance to indicate whether they want to be listed as contributors. CAST staff can provide contact information for members you need to reach.

No. Any costs for external submissions are the responsibility of the submitting contributors or their institutions.

Yes, and CAST encourages it. The share kit is designed for this — forward it to your institution's communications team when CAST sends it.

CAST sends a reach report to all Task Force authors after rollout, covering website views, downloads, and social reach.